Home Uncategorized Why products fail (Part X)

Why products fail (Part X)

32
0
Google search engine

By Oluwole Dada

In the last post on why products fail, it was emphasized that a product can fail even when consumers want it. This isn’t because the price is wrong, or poor quality, or because the product is not known, but because the product is simply unavailable when and where the customer is ready to buy. This is the often-overlooked power of distribution. Distribution isn’t merely a logistics function; it is a critical component of marketing and a source of competitive advantage.

Geographic gaps, wrong channels, persistent stock-outs and weak trade relationships can quietly destroy demand and transfer customers to competitors. Tolaram’s Indomie deliberate distribution was analysed. This week, the distribution of Coca-Cola will be reviewed.

There is a reason that Coca-Cola is available in more countries than the United Nations has member states. There’s a reason that in some of the most remote, infrastructure-challenged, and logistically complex markets in the world, you can find a bottle of Coke before you can find clean drinking water. That reason is not the formula.

It isn’t the advertising. It’s the distribution system. Coca-Cola has one of the most sophisticated, most deliberately engineered, and most commercially consequential supply chain architectures in the history of consumer goods. In the Nigerian market, Coca-Cola Nigeria’s distribution model is a masterclass in how to build availability into the operating DNA of an organisation. 

The company operates through a tiered distribution system: bottling partners, major distributors, sub-distributors, and a van sales network that reaches into markets and neighbourhoods that the formal supply chain cannot efficiently serve directly. The manual distribution centres and territory sales teams are not a legacy of an era before modern logistics.

They are a deliberate strategic choice to ensure that the product is available at the precise locations where the Nigerian mass consumer makes their beverage purchase decision. This is a roadside kiosk, a bus stop shop, a market stall, or a provisions store in a secondary town that no formal distribution network would prioritise.

What Coca-Cola understands, and what many consumer goods organisations are still learning, is that distribution in the Nigerian market isn’t a single channel challenge. It is a multi-tier, multi-channel, geographically fragmented challenge that requires a distribution architecture specifically designed for the market’s realities. It isn’t an adaptation of a distribution model designed for a more formally structured retail environment. The commercial consequence of Coca-Cola’s distribution investment is visible in the brand’s resilience against competitive pressure. When CSD challengers employ aggressive marketing and pricing tactics against Coca-Cola in the Nigerian market, Coca-Cola’s distribution depth has consistently provided a buffer that marketing spend alone couldn’t replicate. 

Distribution presence at the moment of decision is worth more, in competitive terms, than advertising presence at a moment when no purchase is being made. The Coca-Cola distribution system converts brand preference into purchase at scale, reliably, and in places that competitors haven’t yet reached. This is one of the most damaging misalignments in consumer goods marketing: a communication investment that builds desire faster than the distribution investment builds availability. When the consumer is primed to buy and cannot find the product, the priming is wasted. Worse, the consumer who sought the product and was disappointed is now an active detractor because they tried to choose you, but you were not there. That’s a harder consumer to win back than one who never tried at all.

Let me now turn to the other side of this conversation. What happens to products whose distribution strategy is inadequate, and how that inadequacy produces failure even when the product itself is sound. I have seen products in the Nigerian market that were genuinely good, correctly formulated, appropriately priced, adequately branded but failed because the distribution network deployed to support them was too shallow to sustain the product through the critical early period of market establishment. The product was available in Lagos and Abuja but absent in Port Harcourt, Kano, and the secondary cities where significant consumer demand existed. The marketing campaign drove awareness that the distribution couldn’t fulfil. Consumers who had heard about the product and sought to buy it found it unavailable, and their attention moved on.

Build your distribution with the same strategic rigour you bring to your product development and your brand building. Map the channels your consumer uses and ensure your product is present in every one of them. And when the market shows you a distribution gap such as a geography you aren’t serving, a channel you aren’t reaching, and a trade partner who has deprioritised your product, treat it with the urgency it deserves. Every distribution gap is an open invitation to a competitor. Close them before someone else walks through.

Oluwole Dada is the General Manager at SecureID Limited, Africa’s largest smart card manufacturing plant in Lagos, Nigeria.

Previous articlePolitical parties field 189 candidates for 17 NASS seats in Oyo
Next articleNCC Board meets, receives updates on strategic priorities, operational performance, market developments, others

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here